ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-policyimpl-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Consensus Call for Final Policy & Implementation WG Recommendations

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Consensus Call for Final Policy & Implementation WG Recommendations
  • From: Tom Barrett <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 10:38:51 -0400

I concur that the final report represents a consensus of the working
group.  Great job everyone!  and a nod of appreciation to the patience of
the ICANN staff during some of the endless debates about some of the more
arcane issues.

best regards,

tom


On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  As co-chairs of the Policy & Implementation WG, J. Scott and I have
> reached the following conclusions:
>
> 1.       All of the public comments have been reviewed and discussed by
> the WG and amendments made to the Initial Report as agreed to by the WG.
>
> 2.       There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated
> on the WG list since Marika sent the latest redline version of the Final
> Report to the WG list on 21 May with a response deadline of Tuesday 26
> May at 14.00 UTC.
>
> 3.       There is full consensus of the WG on the Final Report as
> attached in clean and redline versions, noting that the redline version
> highlights all edits made to the Initial Report that was published for
> public comment in March 2015 (
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/policy-implementation-2015-01-19-en
> ).
>
>
>
> All WG participants have until 23:59 UTC on Friday, 29 May, 2015 to object
> to the ‘full consensus’ call by the co-chairs.  If anyone objects, please
> explain your reasons.  If no one objects in the allotted time, the report
> will be sent by our Council Liaison Amr to the GNSO Council for their
> action along with a draft motion for its approval.
>
>
>
> If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask.
>
>
>
> Thanks to everyone for helping us get to this point.
>
>
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
>
>
>  “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use
> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
> information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and
> exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as
> attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message
> immediately.”
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy