<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Possible Face to Face Meeting
- To: "'Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx'" <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Possible Face to Face Meeting
- From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:35:56 -0700
Jeff, It is too much to ask for an additional trip of any length this year,
if at all. I am copying the Council list so everyone is informed that this
request is coming from one of the PPSC work teams.
The new Council ought to prioritize this work along with all of its other
work, as its first effort at and after Seoul. I certainly do not think it
is as big a priority as several other ongoing efforts on Council and in WGs.
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
<http://service.ringcentral.com/ringme/callback.asp?mbid=57178438,0,&referer
=http://rodenbaugh.com/contact> (415) 738-8087
<http://rodenbaugh.com/> http://rodenbaugh.com
From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 8:22 AM
To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Possible Face to Face Meeting
Dear All,
As most of you are aware, the PDP-WT has made slow progress on the new
Policy Development Process partly due to limited attendance and
participation over the last few months. With the new Council taking its seat
in Seoul, we have been discussing ways to speed up the process and come to a
timely agreement on the new Policy Development Process. As a result, we
would like to propose to organise a 1.5 - 2 day face to face meeting of the
PDP-WT. The objective of this meeting would be to wrap up the discussions on
the different stages and reach agreement on the overall recommendations and
proposed changes to the ICANN by-laws in order to implement the new PDP.
To facilitate such a meeting, ICANN has informed me that it would take care
of arranging the logistics and provide funding to a limited number of
participants (e.g. 1 participant from each constituency, Advisory Committee,
etc.). Taking into account the geographic spread of the participants of the
WT, the proposal would be to organize the meeting on the US East Coast, e.g.
Washington DC. Of course, remote participation facilities would be made
available for those not able to travel to the meeting. Ideally such a
meeting would be held before the end of the year or in early January at the
latest.
The WT might want to discuss this proposal in further detail at its meeting
coming Thursday and on the e-mail list prior to Seoul. If there is support
for the organisation of such a face to face meeting, the next step would be
to confirm a date and location as soon as possible so that the necessary
arrangements can be made in a timely fashion.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx /
<http://www.neustar.biz/> www.neustar.biz
_____
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
delete the original message.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|