<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp]
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>, "PPSC" <gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp]
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 16:44:51 -0500
Its an interesting question as it appears that many of the members of
the PPSC are no longer active. What I think we need to do is to draft a
summary of comments received to date and get that to the Council along
with the paper that has already been drafted. These will include a
summary of the comments on equal representation from the NCSG. But we
need to get it to the Council by the 10th. I am sure the reps of each
of the groups will contact their councilors and further discussion will
ensue.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:07 PM
To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx; PPSC
Cc: Chuck Gomes
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp]
On 8 Dec 2009, at 20:36, Marika Konings wrote:
> - the basic request for the F2F meetin
> The request for the face-to-face meeting was shared with the PPSC and
should be forwarded by Jeff to the GNSO Council shortly according to his
message on 5 December (see
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-ppsc/msg00117.html)
Does this mean there was consensus in the PPSC on this.
Or was that not required?
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|