<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Proposed questions for stage V
- To: "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Proposed questions for stage V
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:35:18 -0700
Marika, Jeff, and Team:
First off, I seem to be having some issues with this file. It doesn't
want to open or edit cleanly in Word, so I've used Pages. As a result
of these difficulties, I'll post my comments in-line:
Section 1:
Suggest we add 1(h): "What role should the WG have in proposing
performance metrics?" I believe that tasking the PDP WG with defining
the success conditions for its proposed policies will result in narrower
and more actionable policy outputs.
Section 2:
Overall, this is a good list. But I have some concern that these could
be seen as the various scenarios under which the Council could subvert
the consensus of the group. Or am I reading this incorrectly?
Section 3:
No comments at this time, will see what discussion arises during
tomorrow's call.
Thanks--
J.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Proposed questions for stage V
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, January 22, 2010 12:56 pm
To: "Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
Dear All,
As discussed on yesterday’s meeting, please find attached the
proposed questions / issues for stage V – Policy Effectiveness and
Compliance. Please review and share your comments / edits with the
mailing list.
Thanks,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|