<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-ppsc-pdp] Your input requested - recommendation 15 Economic Impact Analysis
- To: "Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Your input requested - recommendation 15 Economic Impact Analysis
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 02:47:02 -0700
For discussion / consideration:
* WT could consider recommending that the PDP rules of procedure should
mention the option of an economic impact analysis that could be conducted on
the recommendation of the GNSO Council and/or ICANN staff when deemed
appropriate or necessary
* Alternatively, the WT could decide not to make any recommendation on this
issue
>From PDP-WT – Draft Conclusions and Recommendations – Updated 11 May
10. Economic Impact Analysis
Recommendation 15
§ To be decided
Economic Impact Analysis
Current rules and practices
None
Concerns / Questions
10.a Whether to conduct preliminary economic analysis, such as to
evaluate market demands, impact to Community, ICANN staff costs, and other
resources needed from ICANN
PDP WT Response
10.a Some wondered whether it would be feasible to do an economic impact
analysis at this stage of the process? It might be appropriate for some issues,
but not others. Others noted that it might prejudge the outcome. It was noted
that an option could be left to leave this to the discretion of the GNSO
Council, possibly on the recommendation of ICANN staff, to decide, but that
this should not delay the overall process.
10.b (Agree. But a general sense of the size & scope of the issue’s
economic impact may help with prioritization (below)).
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|