Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: [gnso-ppsc] question of conflict of interest

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I has very little to do with trusting Jeff.  No one could or should do this.

It has to do with one not being able to be ones own manager.  In today's 
meeting instead of being the manager who looked at the need to get work done 
more quickly and seriously questioning the chair on why he couldn't,  Jeff was 
the PPSC and PDP WT chair explaining why he could not do the work more quickly. 
 and though Jeff the chair gave no details explaining why he couldn't do the 
work more quickly, Jeff the manger did not question this but just refused the 
logic of motion that would have required more alacrity. 

This is not a proper chain of responsibility.  This is not accountability!

a.



On 9 Dec 2010, at 00:11, Marilyn Cade wrote:

> 
> I too see no reason for concern. If Jeff can't carry workload, I am sure he 
> will ack/and take steps accordingly. 
> 
> I have a lot of respect for Jeff and his commitment and integrity, and 
> responsibility. 
> 
> But I also object to starting over on chair. Let's finish the work with a 
> conaiatent chair who has stated willingness and demonstrated his skills and 
> capability and commitment to fulfilling the ToR....
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Rodenbaugh <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 01:37:24 
> To: <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>; <avri@xxxxxxx>; <gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx>; 
> <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>; <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: [gnso-ppsc] question of conflict of interest
> 
> I see no reason for concern...
> 
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> RODENBAUGH LAW
> tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
> http://rodenbaugh.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Neuman, Jeff
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:35 PM
> To: 'avri@xxxxxxx'; 'gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx'; 'gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx';
> 'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc] question of conflict of interest
> 
> 
> Thanks Avri.  I understand your concern and if those on the PPSC and PDP-WT
> or the Council believe that I will not be able to do both, I will step down
> as Chair of both the SC and WT.  
> 
> I will note, however, that there is no bylaw or operational procedure that
> bars a council member from serving as the chair of a working group and I am
> fine with continuing to serve as well.
> 
> That said, I am happy to follow the will of the Council and the policy
> teams.
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> Vice President, Law & Policy
> NeuStar, Inc.
> Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 07:22 PM
> To: gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx>; Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
> <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-ppsc] question of conflict of interest
> 
> 
> hi,
> 
> As I have done before in other circumstances, I question the legitimacy of
> having a chair for the PPSC  or the PDP WT who has ascended to the GNSO
> council and is one of its vice-chairs    I believe that the influence a
> council member, who is in the position of approving or disapproving the work
> of PPSC and its WTs is not consistent with also being a Chair of either the
> PPSC or of a WT.
> 
> This is a personal question at this point, but I will be forwarding this
> note to the NCSG  to seek their advice on the issue.
> 
> thanks
> 
> a
> 
>