ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ppsc-pdp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-ppsc-pdp] Draft Revisions to Sections 3 and beyond - ALL PLEASE READ

  • To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Draft Revisions to Sections 3 and beyond - ALL PLEASE READ
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:18:23 -0500

Marika & PDP Team,

Please find enclosed my proposed revisions to Sections 3 and 4 (Overarching 
Issues) and (Annex A to the Bylaws). I still need to review the PDP Manual 
section, but I wanted to make sure you had this when you woke up in the morning 
as I may not have that last section done until tomorrow.

In re-reading all of the recommendations, I have recommended that some 
additional provisions and references be added to the Bylaws to be consistent 
with what is there today.  In addition, where I saw staff obligations (like a 
General Council Opinion) mention in the Manual, I added some of that to the 
Bylaws.  The reason is that ICANN staff is not bound by obligations in a GNSO 
Council document, but rather can only be bound by Bylaws of the organization.  
Therefore, if we expect the GC to do something, it needs to be in the Bylaws 
rather than the Manual.  I did not really create any new text for the Bylaw 
outline, but moved some text from what was in the Manual.  I did not take all 
the text, but rather took enough to get the gist and then refer to the PDP 
Manual.

An example I added to the Bylaws was:

Section 5:  Reports

An Initial Report should be delivered to the GNSO Council and posted for a 
public comment period of not less than 30 days, which time may be extended in 
accordance with the PDP Manual.   Following the review of the comments received 
and, if required, additional deliberations, a Final Report shall be produced 
for transmission to the Council.
Although we want the details in the Manual, there should be a reference in the 
Bylaws of what the required outputs are in a sequential order as in the current 
Bylaws.  I know that is what Marika tried to do in Section 1 of the Bylaws, but 
without more context in the bylaws, I personally believed it was not enough.

These are my personal comments and not comments of my stakeholder group, 
company or as Chair.

Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx>  / 
www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


Attachment: Draft Revisions to Sections 3 and beyond.doc
Description: Draft Revisions to Sections 3 and beyond.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy