Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] For Review - Updated PDP-WT Final Report

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry about missing the meeting. I can easily live with this wording. Alan

At 23/05/2011 10:46 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Following today's call, please find attached an updated version of 
> the PDP-WT Final Report incorporating changes discussed at today's 
> and last week's call. For those of you not on the call, please note 
> the modified language for recommendation #4 that was supported by 
> those on the call:
>    * The PDP-WT recommends that a 'request for an Issue Report' 
> template should be developed including items such as: definition of 
> issue; identification and quantification of problems, to the extent 
> feasible; supporting evidence; economic impact(s); effect(s) on 
> competition and consumer trust and privacy and other rights, and; 
> rationale for policy development. Any request for an Issue Report, 
> either by completing the template included in the PDP Manual or in 
> another form, must include at a minimum: the name of the requestor 
> and the definition of the issue. The submission of any additional 
> information, such as the identification and quantification of 
> problems, and other as outlined for example in the template, is 
> strongly encouraged, but not required.
> Please share your comments on this recommendation, and/or any other 
> items in the report at the latest by close of business on Wednesday 
> 25 May so that these can be reviewed and discussed at the PDP-WT 
> meeting on Thursday. In the meantime, I'll work on updating the 
> flowchart and double checking the different references to 
> recommendations as with the removal of recommendation #13, the 
> numbering has changed.
> Thanks,
>
> Marika