<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Proposed Working Group Team Charter
- To: Gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Proposed Working Group Team Charter
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:01:47 -0600
i think i'm confused.
if we're working on a draft of our charter (your attached redline),
isn't now the time to answer those questions? or alternatively,
should we re-title the document we're working on right now, so's to
leave room/time for that first-objective charter-review you're describing?
a sketchy charter can lead to troubles down the line...
at a minimum, i'd like to see a definition of the problem we're
supposed to be solving, a description of the deliverables, a hint of
the tasks in in front of us and a description of our roles and
responsibilities as working group members.
m
At 12:34 PM 1/23/2009, J. Scott Evans wrote:
Mike:
Thanks. One of the first objectives of the actual team will be to
review the Charter. Since you are incommunicado at the moment, we
can wait until our first team meeting and work through this list if
others feel it would be a worthwhile exercise. That said, I want to
move the charter discussion along quick so that we can get down to
the real substantive work.
I appreciate your engagement and I look forward to discussing this
matter with you further after your return from vacation.
J. Scott
j. scott evans | senior legal director, global brand & trademark |
Yahoo! Inc. | evansj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | 408.349.1385
From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: J. Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>; Gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 7:21:12 PM
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Proposed Working Group Team Charter
hi all,
thanks for the redline Scott.
i'm on vacation and won't be able to really participate a lot until
i get back to real Internet access in a few weeks, but i offer this
small suggestion as to a series of questions that we might want to
answer in our chartering;
<http://www.haven2.com/pdchecklist.html>http://www.haven2.com/pdchecklist.html
i'll have more to say on this once i get back from vacation but hope
that we might get to a charter that can answer most of these
questions before we get too far down the road.
m
At 07:28 PM 1/22/2009, J. Scott Evans wrote:
> Dear Working Group Team Members:
>
> I am attaching the following documents for your consideration:
>
> 1. The current draft of the WG team Charter; and
>
> 2. A redlined version of the current draft showing the revisions
that have been made to this document from the proposed charter
originally posted on the PPSC Wiki.
>
> The PPSC is currently reviewing these documents and taking
comments from the PPSC members and observers on these
documents. These comments will be accepted until January 28,
2009. After that time, the PPSC will be calling for consensus on
this proposed Charter.
>
> While one of the first tasks of the fully constituted WG Team
will be to review, revise if necessary and approve this proposed
Charter, I wanted to give each of those that have expressed an
interest in serving on this team a chance to comment at this stage
in the hopes of reducing this as a deliverable for the team once we
formally begin our work. To this end, I would ask that anyone who
has comment to submit it to the list or, if you prefer, to me
privately and I will pass it on to the members of the PPSC.
>
> If anyone has any questions, please feel free to contact me directly.
>
> Kind regards.
>
> J. Scott
>
> j. scott evans | senior legal director, global brand & trademark
| Yahoo! Inc. | <mailto:evansj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>evansj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
408.349.1385
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - <http://www.avg.com/>http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.12/1910 - Release Date:
1/22/2009 6:28 PM
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.12/1910 - Release Date:
1/22/2009 6:28 PM
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|