Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Your feedback requested - Section 6.1.2. Transparency and Openness

["S. Subbiah" <subbiah@xxxxxxxxx>]

It should be prospective - the danger of spell checker algorithms I guess.

I do not have the examples in front of me to make a comment right now.

Marika Konings wrote:

> *6.1.2.    Transparency and Openness
> *
> All GNSO Working Groups are expected to operate under the principles 
> of transparency and openness, which means, /inter alia/, that mailing 
> lists are publicly archived, meetings are normally recorded and/or 
> transcribed, and SOIs are required from Working Group participants. It 
> is important that perspective Working Group members are made aware of 
> these principles.  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Comments:
> *
> CG: Should the word ‘perspective’ in the last sentence be ‘prospective’?
>
> INTA: This subsection reiterates ICANN’s goals by stating that all WGs 
> are expected to operate under the principles of transparency and 
> openness, followed by a few examples that do not necessarily – on 
> their face – further these principles. The Committee recommends:
> · That the subsection be modified to either delete the examples or 
> explain how the examples promote the principles of transparency and 
> openness;
> · that the word “perspective” in the second sentence of this 
> subsection should be “prospective.”