RE: [gnso-ppsc] CALL FOR CONSENSUS: Revised Final GNSO Working Group Guidelines

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff,
  
1. Do you accept this report to be final and ready to be transmitted to
the GNSO Council?   Yes

2. Do you believe we should recommend to the GNSO Council that they
commence a public comment period prior to acting on the recommendations
contained within the report?    Not necessary to recommend this, but
no objection to doing so.

Tim

>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Neuman, Jeff 
>   To: gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx 
>   Cc: Working Group ; cgreer@xxxxxxxxx 
>   Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 2:02 PM
>   Subject: [gnso-ppsc] CALL FOR CONSENSUS: 
>   Revised Final GNSO Working Group Guidelines
>   
> 
>   All,
>    
>   Please 
>   find enclosed the final clean Working Group Work Team Final Report (and 
>   redline) that incorporates all of the changes agreed to by the PPSC.  
>   There have been some updates to the background section to reflect the 
> current 
>   state of the document.
>    
>   I would like to have affirmative responses from one person from each of the 
>   constituencies/stakeholder groups of the PPSC by no later than December 
>   20th, 2010 to the following questions:
>    
>   1.  Do you accept this report to be final and ready to be transmitted to 
> the GNSO 
>   Council?
>
>   2.  Do you believe we should recommend to the GNSO Council that they 
> commence 
>   a public comment period prior to acting on the recommendations contained 
> within 
>   the report?
>    
>   Although 
>   the ALAC does not have a formal �vote�, I still would like to note the view 
> of 
>   the ALAC representative to the Council when communicating the report.  
>   Below is a list of members.  As I am the Registry representative, and 
>   also the Chair, I would normally delegate the �vote� to my alternate.  
>   Unfortunately, my alternate is no longer active.  I will therefore see 
>   advice from our registry rep on the Working Group work team (Caroline 
> Greer) 
>   and make sure she is comfortable in communicating the registry 
>   response.
> 
> Thanks.
>   Current Members (updated 18 March 2010):
>            
>         Organization       
>         Primary       
>         Alternate       
>         Other       
>         BC       
>         Mike Rodenbaugh       
>         Zahid Jamil                      
>         IPC       
>         J. Scott Evans (alternate Chair)       
>         Steve Metalitz       
>         ISPC       
>         Tony Harris       
>         Tony Holmes       
>         NCSG       
>         Gabriel Pineiro       
>         Konstantinos Komaitis       
>         Avri Doria       
>         RySG       
>         Jeff Neuman (Chair)       
>         Catherine Sigmar                 
>         RrSG       
>         Tim Ruiz       
>         Tom Keller       
>         NCA       
>         Olga Cavalli (GNSO Council Vice-Chair)       
>         GNSO Council       
>         Chuck Gomes (GNSO Council Chair)       
>         Stephane van Gelder (GNSO Council Vice-Chair)
>   Other Participants in the PPSC:       
>         Liaison       
>         Primary       
>         Alternate
>         ALAC       
>         Alan Greenberg       
>         Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>         GAC       
>         Bertrand de la Chappelle
> 
>       
>   Jeffrey J. Neuman    
> Neustar, 
>   Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 46000 
>   Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: 
>   +1.571.434.5772  
>   Mobile: 
>   +1.202.549.5079 
>    Fax: 
>   +1.703.738.7965 
>   / 
>   jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  / 
>   www.neustar.biz 
>         
> 
>   The 
>   information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of 
>   the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
>   information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
>   e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or 
>   copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
>   communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the 
> original 
>   message.
> 
>