<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-pro-wg] Sample PRO Questions
- To: <gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-pro-wg] Sample PRO Questions
- From: "Michael D. Palage" <Michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:05:38 -0400
Hello All:
Here are some sample questions for consideration for the survey:
Economic and time commitment burden of start-up protection mechanism
(1-5) (low-high)
Do you believe that a uniform (a.k.a. one size fits all) approach to the
protection of the rights of others is prudent? [y/n]
Should registry operators be allowed to propose ip protection mechanisms
tailored to specific needs of their business model/community provided
that certain base line criteria are met? [y/n]
Should registries provided IP owners new intellectual property rights or
of enhanced protection of rights in cyberspace compared to the
protection that exists in the real world? [y/n]
Is the proposed IP protection mechanism subject to gaming by either
speculators and/or trademark owners seeking to achieve a registration
advantage over another legitimate trademark owner [high risk/med
risk/low risk]
Can a Sunrise process serve as suitable IP protection mechanism in
connection with a TLD associated within a defined geographic region
where there is a
centralized trademark database for the registry to verfied trademark
owner rights? [yes, no]
Is a Sunrise process a viable IP protection mechanism where the
charter/community of the TLD served can be associated with a specific
international trademark classification? [yes/no]
Should any IP protection policy discriminate between different rights
owners, i.e. nationally registered trademark receive protection, whereas
state, local or common law rights are denied protection? [y/n]
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|