ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Meeting Summary - 14 May

  • To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Meeting Summary - 14 May
  • From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:10:18 -0400

They were not dismissed out of hand and I take offense at your
assumption that deferral = dismissal.  Because you were not available to
answer questions that may arise while discussing them, I made the
decision that, out of fairness, we should wait until Wednesday in the
hope that you would be available.  Based on your message below, I will
ensure that we discuss and vote on the proposals on Wednesday regardless
of whether you are on the call.


        From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 5:05 PM
        To: Rosette, Kristina
        Cc: gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Meeting Summary - 14 May
        I will do my best to participate on the call. Regardless, I do
not expect my suggestion so to be dismissed out of hand because they
don't fit the views of certain members of WG, or because those members
don't like my answers. I believe I've answered any questions raised so
far, and even offered a modified version. If there are other questions
please let me know.


                -------- Original Message --------
                Subject: [gnso-pro-wg] Meeting Summary - 14 May
                From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
                Date: Mon, May 14, 2007 3:45 pm
                To: <gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
                Thanks to everyone who participated in today's meeting.
We accomplished a lot.  Here's a meeting summary with action items in
bold red. 
                1.  Definitions.  Everyone is to use the list to put
forth definitions, revised proposed ones, etc.  More specifically,
please use the document I circulated today to add new definitions or
propose suggestions.  If you want to propose a new definition for an
already-listed term, please include it below the original definitions
and identify it as ALTERNATIVE.  If you want to revise a definition, you
can do so within the existing definition as long as you circulate a
track changes or redline.  Please indicate in your cover email to the
list what you've added or changed (e.g., added definition for X, changed
definition for Y).  During our meeting on Wednesday, we will "vote" on
definitions put forward and discussed via list; there will be very
little time for discussion.
                2.  Proposed Principles .  We discussed the principles
in the document I circulated last night.  I will circulate a revised
chart that reflects the current "status" of the various proposals.
Please review it and comment by list.  Everyone is free to post
additional proposals with the caveats that (a) the proponent must
provide clear explanations and be prepared to answer all questions
posted to the list; and (b) the new proposals should be in "final" form
by our call on Wednesday.  
                (Tim - We did not discuss your proposals because we
wanted to ensure that you had the opportunity to present them and answer
the inevitable questions.  We planned to do that on Wednesday if you
will be on the call.)
                3.  IDN -related statement posted by Avri.  Please
review the statement and post a message to the list that sets out the
following:  (a)  Do you have any objection to or disagreement with this
statement such that you would object to using the "Agreement" convention
for it?  If so, please identify the basis of the disagreement and what
changes, if any, would allow you to support it.  (b)  If you do not have
an objection to it, please state if you believe we should draw a
principle from it.  (c) If your answer to (b) is "yes," please post a
proposed principle using the MUST-SHOULD-MAY convention.
                Questionnaire results .  It occurs to me that I don't
believe we've discussed Liz's question of how to represent the
questionnaire results in the report.  Liz, did you have any suggestions
in mind?  Anyone else?
                Many thanks, all. Talk to you on Wednesday. 

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy