RE: [SUSPECTED SPAM][gnso-pro-wg] PDP Dec 05: PRO WG Report

["Griffin, Lance" <Lance.Griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think we discussed this already.

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 11:38 AM
To: gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [SUSPECTED SPAM][gnso-pro-wg] PDP Dec 05: PRO WG Report


Why?

Tim 




        -------- Original Message --------
        Subject: RE: [SUSPECTED SPAM][gnso-pro-wg] PDP Dec 05:  PRO WG
Report
        From: "Griffin, Lance" <Lance.Griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
        Date: Fri, June 22, 2007 11:31 am
        To: "Liz Williams" <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>,
<gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
        
        
        Liz:
        
        I do not agree that this should be called a "minority
statement". 
        
        -Lance  
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx
<https://email.secureserver.net/pcompose.php?aEmlPart=0&type=replyall&fo
lder=INBOX&uid=100836#Compose>  [mailto:owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx
<https://email.secureserver.net/pcompose.php?aEmlPart=0&type=replyall&fo
lder=INBOX&uid=100836#Compose> ]
        On Behalf Of Liz Williams
        Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 7:31 AM
        To: gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx
<https://email.secureserver.net/pcompose.php?aEmlPart=0&type=replyall&fo
lder=INBOX&uid=100836#Compose> 
        Subject: [SUSPECTED SPAM][gnso-pro-wg] PDP Dec 05: PRO WG Report
        
        Colleagues
        
        I have omitted, in error, Tim Ruiz' minority statement which he
wanted
        included in the PRO WG report.
        
        It is attached here for your information and for consideration
within
        the PRO WG discussion on 23 June.
        
        After the meeting, I will amend the posted report to ensure that
it's
        included as part of the record within the report.
        
        Kind regards.
        
        Liz