[gnso-raa-b] Update on next steps and apologies
- To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-raa-b] Update on next steps and apologies
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:16:04 -0700
I apologize, but it looks like I may not be able to make the call
tomorrow, although I still intend to try. So I'd like to offer some
thoughts on what we discussed last call, and another idea.
There were a few ideas put forward regarding the next steps I proposed
on the last call. As I noted, the RrSG feels strongly that only the two
parties to the agreement should be involved in the actual negotiations.
However, as discussed if there is a reiterative process that would keep
the community more informed and involed we would be open to that. If
there is anything specific we can define in that regard it would be
helpful in keeping things moving forward on this.
I would also like to make a proposal on another open issue, identifying
those items that would require the consensus policy process. Instead of
us trying to hash that out, we should ask John Jeffrey to do that for
the group. I know some work may have been done on that, but it should be
reviewed by John for his opinion.