Re: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

My view and preference for ii) were no doubt clear in the call but should
be recorded here...


Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 16 April 2010 09:07, Metalitz, Steven <met@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> I definitely support option (ii) as well.
>
> Steve Metalitz
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 5:57 PM
> To: Margie Milam
> Cc: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-b] Scheduling RAA Subteam BG Session in Brussels
>
>
> Margie
>
> Thanks for the concise summary
>
> While I was on the call and already expressed very clearly my preference
> for option 2 I'd like to take this opportunity to do formally on the
> list
>
> Regards
>
> Michele
>
> On 15 Apr 2010, at 22:49, Margie Milam wrote:
>
> > Hi-
> >
> > Following up on issues raised on today's call, the drafting team
> discussed two different approaches for addressing the RAA Amendments
> topics in Brussels.      The drafting team is considering either (i) a
> standard GNSO type workshop, where the Initial Report would be reviewed
> with those interested in the topic, or (ii) a large cross-supporting
> organization session, where the SO/ACs can participate and share their
> perspective, including as one of the topics, inviting law enforcement
> and GAC representatives to explain their support for the LEA amendment
> topics, and having Registrars explain their concerns with some of the
> LEA proposals.    If this sub-team supports the approach in (ii), we
> would attempt to schedule this on Monday of the ICANN meeting to gather
> maximum cross-SO/AC participation.     Adopting (ii) would be intended
> to serve as a forum to respond to the GAC's endorsement of the LEA
> amendments, as well as the significant  press that has been focused on
> the LEA !
>  related requests.
> >
> > The participants on today's call supported (ii) but wanted to get
> broader input  from those unable to participate on today's call.     If
> you have a preference on this issue, please respond to the list.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Margie
> >
> > ___________
> >
> > Margie Milam
> > Senior Policy Counselor
> > ICANN
> > ___________
>
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
> ICANN Accredited Registrar
> http://www.blacknight.com/
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
> http://mneylon.tel
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
> US: 213-233-1612
> UK: 0844 484 9361
> Locall: 1850 929 929
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
> Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>
>
>
>
>