RE: [gnso-raa-dt] Proposed agenda for: RAA call details / Monday 03 August 1900 UTC

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Not sure that we even need a Chair for either of these efforts. And they
will not work well unless separated. They are NOT related, it was not
discussed as if they were, and the RrC never agreed that they were a
combined effort. That's why there were two resolutions.

Tim

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Proposed agenda for: RAA call details /
Monday 03 August 1900 UTC
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, August 03, 2009 11:06 am
To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx



On 3 Aug 2009, at 11:39, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:

>
> I will volunteer as chair or co-chair, if there are no other 
> volunteers from
> the BC, IPC or ISPCPC leadership. I believe it is important that 
> people
> from non-contracting parties take leadership roles in this group.


Thanks for this.

My personal suggestion would be for someone who was neither on ALAC 
nor the GNSO Council to chair - as part of the effort to spread the 
work beyond official councils, i.e as part of the new council as 
policy manager effort

I also think we should appoint someone to act as a GNSO council 
liaison(s) to the group. You are already doing several of these, but 
we can discuss that in the next council meeting.

As for non-contracting parties versus contracting parties, one idea 
may be to have 2 co-chairs, with one from each house.

Thanks
a.