RE: [gnso-raa-dt] RESEND: RAA versions and possible discrepancies

["Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>]

Alan, re 3.7.5 in particular, see
http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/eddp.htm, in which these provisions
were added to the RAA in 2004 as part of adoption of the Expired Domains
Deletion Policy.   This does not explain why they do not appear in the
redline but does explain how they got into the agreement.  

Steve  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:36 PM
To: gnso-raa-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-raa-dt] RESEND: RAA versions and possible discrepancies


Sorry if this posts twice - first version seems to have been lost.  Alan
------------------

Two comments.

First, Margie's document would be more useful if it indicated which 
rights/obligations were due to the amended RAA, and which were for 
the older agreement.

Second, in reviewing Margie's document, I cam upon terms that I was 
unfamiliar with. Perhaps I have missed some substantive change, but 
in comparing the RAA now in force 
(http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/ra-agreement-21may09-en.htm) with 
the last redline version I can find 
(http://www.icann.org/en/topics/raa/redline-2001-raa-25nov08.pdf), I 
find they do not match. For instance, section 3.7.5 has several 
subsections added that I cannot see in the redline version. What am I 
missing????

Alan