Re: [gnso-raa-dt] Charter of rights - "wish list"

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 4 Aug 2009, at 23:11, Carlton Samuels wrote:

> I'm hard-pressed to see the need for creating subgroups to address.
From an organizational point of view, is there a suggestion from  
those who think there should be only one group on how we deal with the  
fact that:
Effort A  based on the charter being penned by Steve M. is planned as  
a GNSO Council effort
Effort B based on the desire to identify existing and desired content  
for a registrant bill of rights is a joint GNSO and ALAC effort.
At this point I do not see a practical solution to this.

My suggestion today was that the two efforts go on in parallel, with  
the community review and then council review being of both efforts at  
the same time. I would suggest that both efforts could produce their  
deliverables within 90 days.
a.