<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-rap-dt] Update from Registration Abuse Charter Drafting Team to the GNSO Council
- To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] Update from Registration Abuse Charter Drafting Team to the GNSO Council
- From: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:36:35 -0800
All,
Today the charter drafting team on registration abuse met for the first time.
The group plans to meet weekly but it recognized early on that it would not be
ready to offer a proposed charter by 15 January as requested by the Council.
The team proposes to complete its assignment no later than 12 February, in time
for the Council to consider the proposed charter at its upcoming 19 February
meeting.
Currently the members of the drafting team are:
Olga Cavalli - NomCom
Kristina Rosette - IPC
Mike Rodenbaugh - CBUC
Greg Aaron - Registry c.
James Bladel - Registrar c.
The team urges participation from the ISPCP constituency and NCUC, as well as
interested AC participation.
I've reprinted the relevant resolution below for your reference.
Thanks, Liz
_______________________________________
Resolution on the GNSO Issues Report on Registration Abuse Policies
Whereas:
The GNSO Issues Report on Registration Abuse Policies indicated that further
review, evaluation and study be done before a PDP is initiated,
Resolved:
That a drafting team be formed to create a proposed charter for a working group
to investigate the open issues documented in the issues report on Registrations
Abuse Policy. Specifically:
9.1 Review and Evaluate Findings
A first step would be for the GNSO Council to review and evaluate the findings,
taking into account that this report provides an overview of registration abuse
provisions, but does not analyse how these provisions are implemented in
practice and whether they are deemed effective in addressing registration abuse.
9.2 Identify specific policy issues
Following the review and evaluation of the findings, the GNSO Council would
need to determine whether there are specific policy issues regarding
registration abuse. As part of this determination it would be helpful to define
the specific type(s) of abuse of concern, especially distinguishing between
registration abuse and other types of abuse if relevant.
9.3 Need for further research
As part of the previous two steps, ICANN Staff would recommend that the GNSO
Council determines where further research may be needed - e.g. is lack of
uniformity a substantial problem, how effective are current registration abuse
provisions in addressing abuse in practice, is an initial review or analysis of
the UDRP required?
The WG charter should be ready for review by the council on or before 15
January 2009 and will be voted on at the council meeting of 29 January 2009 at
which time the council will take the by-laws required PDP vote.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|