[gnso-rap-dt] Updated programme for GNSO Council and updated answers

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

As discussed please find attached the updated programme to be shared with the 
GNSO Council (no names of speakers included, only affiliation) and below the 
updated answers to the questions raised by Chuck. Mike agreed to send these to 
the Council ASAP, together with the SSAC request (also attached) in time for 
the Council meeting tomorrow with the caveat that not all members of the 
drafting team have had an opportunity to review this latest version.

With best regards,

Marika


 1.  Is the additional research supposed to be done before the WG finishes its 
work? This will be for the WG to determine as it depends of the scope and size 
of the research that needs to be undertaken.
 2.  Is the WG supposed to finish its work in 90 days after Mexico City or 
simply report on progress then? If the WG is not finished by then, it is the 
expectation that the WG would present its progress together with the expected 
end date of its work.
 3.  Is the WG supposed to attempt to make a recommendation to the Council on 
whether to initiate a PDP or not? More specifically, the WG is expected to make 
a recommendation about which registration abuse policy issues, if any, are 
appropriate for a PDP.

Attachment: SSAC request.doc
Description: SSAC request.doc

Attachment: Registration Abuse Policies Workshop - Draft Programme for Council - Updated 18 February 2009.doc
Description: Registration Abuse Policies Workshop - Draft Programme for Council - Updated 18 February 2009.doc