<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-rap-dt] Updated Registration Abuse Policies workshop programme
- To: "gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] Updated Registration Abuse Policies workshop programme
- From: "Brendler, Beau" <Brenbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:17:26 -0500
good idea
________________________________________
From: owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Rosette, Kristina [krosette@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 10:14 AM
To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] Updated Registration Abuse Policies workshop
programme
Fine with me.
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:07 AM
To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-rap-dt] Updated Registration Abuse Policies workshop
programme
Dear All,
It occurred to me after our call that we did not consider SSAC participation in
the workshop, despite their activities in this area and their request for
collaboration. It might be appropriate to invite them to participate in the
last panel discussion on ‘what role for ICANN’ like the group has done with the
other constituencies and ALAC. If there are no objections, I would propose I
contact Steve Crocker to discuss whether he or another SSAC representative
would be available and interested to participate.
With best regards,
Marika
On 2/18/09 10:17 PM, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear All,
Following our call today, please find attached the updated programme for the
Registration Abuse Policies workshop. For those of you that were not able to
participate, please note that the only changes that were made relate to
speakers and time allocated to the first topic. We would like to post the
background information and topics as soon as possible on the Mexico City
website, so if there are any concerns in relation to the content, please share
this with the list as soon as possible.
As you will have noted, Mike Rodenbaugh has shared the draft programme (without
names of speakers) with the Council to inform them before their call tomorrow
about the programme. On the call tomorrow, Mike will use the opportunity to
reach out to the ISP, NCUC and ALAC constituencies to put forward a
representative to participate in the workshop. ICANN staff will follow up on
this invitation. In addition, some small edits were made to the questions
raised by Chuck (see below). If there are any concerns about these edits,
please share your views with the list.
Those of you presenting are invited to share any slides or speaking notes for
this workshop beforehand with the group to avoid duplication and ensure all
important issues are addressed. I will work with Glen to see if we can identify
a 15-30 minutes slot on Sunday 1 March (possibly during one of the break) to
sit down and quickly run through the programme.
Thanks,
Marika
1. Is the additional research supposed to be done before the WG finishes its
work? This will be for the WG to determine as it depends of the scope and size
of the research that needs to be undertaken.
2. Is the WG supposed to finish its work in 90 days after Mexico City or
simply report on progress then? If the WG is not finished by then, it is the
expectation that the WG would present its progress together with the expected
end date of its work.
3. Is the WG supposed to attempt to make a recommendation to the Council on
whether to initiate a PDP or not? More specifically, the WG is expected to make
a recommendation about which registration abuse policy issues, if any, are
appropriate for a PDP.
***
Scanned
**
This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named
above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be
confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you
may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment
for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply
e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your
computer system.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|