[gnso-rap-dt] Response to Council question in relation to 90 days timeline

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

As discussed on our call, please find below the answers that were provided to 
the Council to a number of questions that were raised in relation to the 
Registration Abuse Policies WG Charter. In relation to the question of 90 days 
after Mexico City, it was noted that 'Is the WG supposed to finish its work in 
90 days after Mexico City or simply report on progress then? If the WG is not 
finished by then, it is the expectation that the WG would present its progress 
together with the expected end date of its work.' .

With best regards,

Marika


------ Forwarded Message
From: Mike Rodenbaugh <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Mike Rodenbaugh <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:17:37 -0800
To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] FW: [gnso-rap-dt] Updated programme for GNSO Council and 
updated answers

Dear Council,

Fyi below and attached, including the Draft Programme for the Registration 
Abuse Policy workshop to be held on Tuesday evening in Mexico City, the SSAC 
request to the RAP Drafting Team, and answers to Chuck's questions regarding 
the draft Charter for the RAP Working Group which we will vote on tomorrow.

It was agreed to send this to Council, after the Drafting Team call this 
morning, although a couple members of the Drafting Team have not reviewed the 
final versions of the programme or answers to Chuck's questions.

Please let me know any questions.

Thanks,
Mike

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:13 AM
To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] Updated programme for GNSO Council and updated answers

Dear All,

As discussed please find attached the updated programme to be shared with the 
GNSO Council (no names of speakers included, only affiliation) and below the 
updated answers to the questions raised by Chuck. Mike agreed to send these to 
the Council ASAP, together with the SSAC request (also attached) in time for 
the Council meeting tomorrow with the caveat that not all members of the 
drafting team have had an opportunity to review this latest version.

With best regards,

Marika

 1.  Is the additional research supposed to be done before the WG finishes its 
work? This will be for the WG to determine as it depends of the scope and size 
of the research that needs to be undertaken.
 2.  Is the WG supposed to finish its work in 90 days after Mexico City or 
simply report on progress then? If the WG is not finished by then, it is the 
expectation that the WG would present its progress together with the expected 
end date of its work.
 3.  Is the WG supposed to attempt to make a recommendation to the Council on 
whether to initiate a PDP or not? More specifically, the WG is expected to make 
a recommendation about which registration abuse policy issues, if any, are 
appropriate for a PDP.



------ End of Forwarded Message