<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-rap-dt] RAPWG agenda for April 13
- To: "gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-rap-dt] RAPWG agenda for April 13
- From: "李光皓" <Liguanghao@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:34:10 +0800
Dear Greg:
I am out in traveling, so I won't be able to attend tonight's meeting.
Best Regards,
Guanghao Li
China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC)
Phone:86-10-58813176
Fax:86-10-58812666
Liguanghao@xxxxxxxx
2009-04-13
======== 2009-04-13 05:09:58 您在来信中写道: ========
Dear group:
Agenda for the meeting on Monday 13 April at 14:30 UTC (07:30 PDT, 10:30 EDT,
15:30 London, 16:30 CEST) is:
Roll-call
Walk-through of the attached document.
Discussion of the term “registration”. Does it mean creation of a domain name,
and/or domain life-cycle operations, or something else? (cf. Issues Report)
Action items for April 27th meeting.
With best wishes,
--Greg
From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:28 AM
To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] Updated RAPWG Definitions document
Dear All,
Please find attached and posted on the Wiki
(https://st.icann.org/reg-abuse-wg/index.cgi?registration_abuse_policies_working_group)
the updated RAPWG definitions document which includes additional columns for
the different abuse categories as well as a number of variations of the
definition of abuse for consideration. Please note that I have taken the
liberty to add to the list a definition of misuse that was developed in the
context of another GNSO Working Grouping (the Whois Study Group) which might
provide some additional ideas for consideration.
To facilitate the discussion on the definition of abuse on the mailing list,
you will find the relevant section pasted below. Please feel free to share your
comments and suggestions on the mailing list.
With best regards,
Marika
==================
From the RAPWG Definitions (31 March 2009)
Abuse
Original proposal:
Malicious or wrongful use causing harm or potential harm to registrants and
Internet users.
Variations suggested on the RAP WG Conference Call (30 March) and Adobe Connect:
a) Malicious or illegal use causing harm to registrants and Internet users
b) Malicious or fraudulent use causing harm or potential harm to registrants
and Internet users
c) Malicious or fraudulent use causing harm or intended harm to registrants and
Internet users
d) Conduct which uses a domain name or IP address to cause harm or potential
harm to any third party
e) Malicious or fraudulent use causing harm or undue harm to registrants and
Internet users
f) To treat in a harmful, injurious or offensive way
g) Conduct with no legitimate use or purpose which uses a domain name or IP
address to cause harm or potential harm to any third party
h) Malicious or wrongful use causing harm or potential harm to third parties
i) Malicious or wrongful use causing harm or potential harm to the Internet
Community
j) An activity that imposes negative (economic or other) effects upon another
party
k) Misuse is an action that causes actual harm, is the predicate to such harm,
is illegal or illegitimate, or is otherwise considered contrary to intention
and design of a stated legitimate purpose, if such purpose is disclosed. (from
the Whois Draft Working Definitions prepared by the GNSO drafting team)
Questions raised: How to judge intent? Should intent be part of the definition
of abuse? How do you deal with conduct / technologies that are not malicious by
nature, but become abusive in the way they are being used (intent) e.g. fast
flux? Should a definition include who is targeted by the abuse? How do you
qualify harm or potential harm? How can harm be further defined?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|