<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-rap-dt] Registration abuse definition discussion on at-large list
- To: "gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] Registration abuse definition discussion on at-large list
- From: "Brendler, Beau" <Brenbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:21:07 -0400
Greetings. After our recent phone conference, I posted the definition as
discussed in this WG to the at-large worldwide list for comment and feedback.
Quite a discussion ensued, with posts from Derek Smythe, Karl Auerbach, John
Levine, Evan Leibovitch and many others.
What is the best way to integrate these comments from the at-large community
into this working group discussion? Can I assume you are all on the at-large
worldwide list, and therefore able to monitor the discussion? Or can I ask
someone on staff to put the comments together to include in this WG's
discussion? What I'm trying to avoid here is duplication of effort, and,
frankly, putting together all the comments generated, something I don't have
time at the moment to do. The subject header on the at-large list is
"Definition of registration abuse," with most of the activity taking place over
the last 24 hours.
Beau Brendler
**
This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named
above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be
confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you
may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment
for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply
e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your
computer system.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|