<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: REMINDER FW: [gnso-rap-dt] For review - RAP WG Status Update
- To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: REMINDER FW: [gnso-rap-dt] For review - RAP WG Status Update
- From: Roland Perry <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:11:12 +0100
In message <C6455729.44EA%marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, at 00:11:04 on Fri,
29 May 2009, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> writes
Please feel free to share your comments / suggestions with the mailing
list and/or provide edits to the attached document.
Where it says:
* This is a working definition as per group consensus on April 27,
2009 and may be re-visited should the WG find it inadequate after
examining some specific examples.
I do not consider that it can be described as a consensus when there is
such an important re-visitation anticipated. I would suggest that the
definition has merely been "parked" awaiting the discussion of specific
examples.
--
Roland Perry
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|