RE: [gnso-rap-dt] Fake Renewal Notices

["Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Mikey and James:

Thanks!  

Lots of case history here -- is the IRTP not looking at the relevant
transfer issue already?

Also looks like this case could have another possible outcome: action by
ICANN compliance department for any contractual violations by the registrar.
But misuse of WHOIS data for marketing purposes is difficult to prove, I
bet.  

Namejuice.com Web-based WHOIS is operating fine, BTW.
https://namejuice.com/whois.asp 

Old RAA 3.3.1 requires the registrar to have web-based WHOIS.  But as far as
I know the RRAs do not require reseller DROA to offer WHOIS.

All best,
--Greg



-----Original Message-----
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 7:34 PM
To: Registration abuse list ICANN
Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] Fake Renewal Notices

the James and Mikey Show (not to be confused with the Keystone Cops) are
happy to submit this 1st-draft discussion of the Fake Renewal Notices topic
we discussed on the last call.  this is the REAL homework assignment peepul.

all the good parts are James' fault, all the stupid bits are mine.

mikey