RE: [gnso-rap-dt] Two items -- revised "reporting" meta-issue draft, and request for permission to include this draft in a memo from IRTP

["Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, Mikey:

 

Thanks for this; much appreciated.

 

What is being advocated is methodology that we suggest be applied whenever
policy is made.  I wonder if that is fodder for a best-practices or advisory
group - like the PPSC or a GNSO improvements effort.  (PDPs are more about
policy development and perhaps less about creating working methods.)  Maybe
Marika has some insights on that.

 

I suggest we always feel free to lay out facts and point out needs for
certain things - but are we knowledgeable enough to advocate for specific
ICANN staff budget requests?    

 

All best,

--Greg

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:55 AM
To: Registration abuse list ICANN
Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] Two items -- revised "reporting" meta-issue draft,
and request for permission to include this draft in a memo from IRTP
Importance: High

 

hi all,

 

this is a little higher than normal urgency.

 

i've attached the latest version of the "reporting" meta-issue thingy.  very
minor changes, nothing terribly substantive.  mostly improves readability.

 

but we got into a discussion over at IRTP about the possibility of writing a
memo to support the Compliance gang in their budget request for improved
complaint-tracking systems and i thought this might be a good document to
staple on the back of that memo.  i don't want to do that without your
permission however.

 

so...  what do you think?  OK for me to attach this draft (with suitable
"it's just a draft!" disclaimers) on that memo-draft?  i'd like to hear from
you by the end of the week if it's possible.  i will take silence as
consent, so just fire off the "hold on there Mike, let's not go off half
cocked" replies.  :-)

 

thanks,

 

mikey