Re: [gnso-rap-dt] front-running recommendation

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

i support where we've arrived at this point.

mikey

On Jan 25, 2010, at 11:36 PM, James M. Bladel wrote:

> 
> Thanks, Faisal.  I also agree that we could do without this sentence
> entirely.
> 
> J.
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rap-dt] front-running recommendation
> From: Faisal Shah <fshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, January 25, 2010 10:52 pm
> To: <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Re: [gnso-rap-dt] front-running recommendation I agree with James’
> modification as well. However, the second sentence is a non sequitur so
> I would eliminate it. 
> 
> 
> On 1/25/10 6:43 PM, "Berry Cobb" <berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I concur with James’ modification.  
> 
> 
> 
> Berry A. Cobb
> Infinity Portals LLC
> 866.921.8891
> 
> 
> From: owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 13:31
> To: Greg Aaron
> Cc: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] front-running recommendation
> 
> 
> Greg:
> 
> I like this.  Perhaps we can append something like:
> 
> 
> 
> "...monitor the issue, and initiate further study and/or policy work if
> evidence of harm is discovered."
> 
> 
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 
> 
> J.
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] front-running recommendation
> From: "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, January 25, 2010 2:56 pm
> To: <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Dear WG:
> 
> 
> 
> We have many (raggedly phrased) front-running recommendations.  I
> propose that we reduce and clarify to one: 
> 
> 
> 
> “At this time it is unclear to what extent front-running happens. 
> There does not appear to be enough concern to warrant policy development
> at this time.  The RAPWG suggests that the Council monitor the issue.“
> 
> 
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 
> 
> All best,
> 
> --Greg
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************
> 
> Greg Aaron
> 
> Director, Key Account Management and Domain Security
> 
> Afilias
> 
> vox: +1.215.706.5700
> 
> fax: 1.215.706.5701
> 
> gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> **********************************
> 
> The information contained in this message may be privileged and
> confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
> message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the
> message and deleting it from your computer.
> 

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)