RE: [gnso-rap-dt] Consensus call - "slamming" recommendation
- To: "'Mike O'Connor'" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registration abuse list ICANN'" <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] Consensus call - "slamming" recommendation
- From: "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 11:25:57 -0400
I'm OK with #2.
So far there is unanimous support for #2.
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 12:24 PM
To: Registration abuse list ICANN
Subject: Re: [gnso-rap-dt] Consensus call - "slamming" recommendation
put me in the #2 column as well.
On May 4, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
Dear RAPWG members:
Following our discussion yesterday, please find below the two
recommendations under consideration in relation to "slamming". In order to
measure the level of consensus, please indicate your preference for
recommendation 1 or 2.
* * *
The RAPWG recommends nothing and remain in the status quo.
The WG feels this issue falls outside the scope of ICANN policy development
The RAPWG recommends the GNSO monitor for this abuse in the gTLD space and
sponsor research to determine the nature and extent of the problem. The WG
believes this issue warrants review but notes there is not enough data at
this time to warrant an Issues Report or PDP.
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,