Re: [gnso-rap-dt] revised RAPWG Final Report draft

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'll check whether there are any issues with the mailing list. If you are 
doubting whether a message went through or not, you can check the mailing list 
archives (see http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-rap-dt/). If your email does 
not appear here, it has not gone through. Do note that you can only send a 
message to the mailing list from the email address(es) with which you have been 
subscribed. If you send it from an alternate address, it will not go through 
(and unfortunately, no error message is sent).

With best regards,

Marika

On 23/05/10 19:24, "frederick felman" <ffelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I wonder if there is something wrong with the list or if there are problems 
with both Berry and Faisal’s machine. He’s had difficulty getting his comments 
(attached) sent to the list as well.


On 5/23/10 9:52 AM, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Forwarded on behalf of Berry Cobb who is having problems with his email client.
__

RAPWG,


Attached are my comments and suggested changes to the Draft Final Report.   
Near the conclusion of our RAPWG call on Monday, I left with the impression 
that we had until Sunday afternoon 5/23 to submit our proposed changes.  I 
would also like to state that there are large quantities of edits to the 
report.  I understand we are on a tight deadline, but given our polling and 
data input after Tuesday, I call for one more round of review before we go to 
print with this final report.  Upon Marika importing the polling and consensus 
results, I recommend that this final round of review start with a “Clean” copy 
as well.


On the topic of polling and in response to Chuck Gomes statements WRT to NCUC 
being allowed to participate in the polling process in the late stages of the 
WG, would it be best that we also find a representative from the IPC to 
participate?  I fell it will ensure broad representation from all 
constituencies.


Most of the my suggested changes are minor with the exception of adding two 
small paragraphs to section 4.2.  I felt it was important to include a bit of 
content that represents the counter view by some WG members WRT to the debate 
of Registration & Use.  I attempted to model a statement similar to the section 
where we define abuse that describe the WGs agreement that this debate will not 
be solved by the WG.  I welcome comments and suggestions for improvement.


I also have a few additional comments not included in the Final Draft:
1) Executive summary.  After reading it closely, I am of the belief that we 
should replace it with a simplified version.  I feel that a single-sentence 
summary of the recommendation and the polled result should only be applied.  It 
is imperative that we force the reader to the details within the sections for a 
full understanding of the recommendation, the polling result, and the reasoning 
for how the WG came to its conclusions.  If we provide the detail we have set 
for now, the lazier reviewers of this report will miss critical information and 
or become confused.


For example:
Cybersquatting (see section 5.1):
Recommendation #1 / PDP – Unanimous
Recommendation #2 / 2 Views – Even Division


Front Running (see section 5.2):
Recommendation #1 / No PDP – Unanimous


Etc…..


2) There is a significant departure of the Cross-TLD Registration Scam in this 
latest version from Greg A from what was submitted before insertion in to the 
Final Draft.    Why weren’t these kinds of changes proposed in our meeting or 
on the list prior to inclusion in to the final report?  Are these types of 
editorial change in the final stage without justification as to why?  I could 
not find any comments as to the proposed changes from the last draft submitted 
to the WG after we agreed on the title of this abuse.  Please advise.


I look forward to our final meeting on Monday.  See you then and please advise 
if you have any questions.  Thank you.


Also, please let me know if this copy gets corrupted.  I fear i have some bug 
issues with Office 2007 on Windoze 7


Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.infinityportals.com
866.921.8891






From: owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Greg Aaron
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 9:59 PM
To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] revised RAPWG Final Report draft


Dear WG:


This revised draft (attached) features:
•             the revision of the cybersquatting definition
•             the addition of the gripe site and reverse hijacking material to 
the cybersquatting background section
•             the tweaked Fake Renewal Notice recommendation as per Berry
•             the Cross-TLD Registration Scam section.
•             9.11: Conclusions, Recommendations, & Next Steps section.  I have 
drafted as no other drafts were posted.
•             Removed references to the Interim Report, fixed typos, added 
notes about WIPO’s comments, etc., all red-lined for your reference.


Please let us know as soon as possible if anything is incorrect.  The hard 
deadline for edits to the paper is this Friday, May 21st, at 20:00 UTC.


Marika: Section 11 is the “Conclusions, Recommendations, & Next Steps” section. 
 Should the WG’s Recommendations go here, or should they remain in section 2.9? 
 (It does not make sense to list them in both places.)   In Section 11 should 
we include the Recommendations in order of level of support received?  All 
thoughts appreciated.


Marika: last page needs a link to the attendance sheet.


Thanks.  I am going to bed now.


All best,
--Greg





**********************************
Greg Aaron
Director, Key Account Management and Domain Security
Afilias
vox: +1.215.706.5700
fax: 1.215.706.5701
gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx
**********************************
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us 
immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.









------ End of Forwarded Message