<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-rap-dt] RAPWG Final Report - Adjustment Recommendation
- To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] RAPWG Final Report - Adjustment Recommendation
- From: berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 01:44:33 -0400
Greg,
I'm satisfied with your version. Thank you sir!
Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.infinityportals.com
866.921.8891
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Aaron [mailto:gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 10:50 AM
To: berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-rap-dt] RAPWG Final Report - Adjustment Recommendation
Change ~ Page 4/5, and Change ~ Page 21
INITIAL REPORT VERSION:
"In discussing registration abuse versus domain name use abuse, the RAPWG
noted that registration abuses may occur at various points in a domain
name's lifecycle. The RAPWG therefore found that making distinctions between
pre-domain-creation, domain-creation, and post-creation abuses is sometimes
not applicable or useful when considering whether an abuse is in-scope for
policy-making."
BERRY's REVISION:
"The RAPWG attempted to make distinctions of abuse within the lifecycle such
as pre-domain-creation, domain-creation, and post-creation. However, this
exercise was not useful in determining policy scope, and as such, the RAPWG
only made the distinction between Registration and Use."
GREG's REVISION OF BERRY'S VERSION:
"The RAPWG attempted to understand abuses by categorizing them based on
domain life cycle -- such as pre-domain-creation, domain-creation, and
post-domain-creation abuses. However, the RAPWG noted that abuses may occur
at various points in a domain name's lifecycle, and that life cycle
categorizations are not always applicable or useful when considering whether
a given abuse is in-scope for policy-making. The RAPWG found that in order
to determine whether an abuse is in policy-making scope, it is important to
identify and understand the registration and use issues involved."
Does that work?
All best,
--Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 11:32 AM
To: gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] RAPWG Final Report - Adjustment Recommendation
RAPWG,
Per our call today, IMO the current text within the Executive Summary
(page 4/5) & Body Content (page 21) is confusing. I recommend the
following change to better represent what the WG completed in our
abuse analysis.
Current Text:
In discussing registration abuse versus domain name use abuse, the
RAPWG noted that registration abuses may occur at various points in a
domain name?s lifecycle. The RAPWG therefore found that making
distinctions between pre-domain-creation, domain-creation, and
post-creation abuses is sometimes not applicable or useful when
considering whether an abuse is in-scope for policy-making.
Proposed Text:
In discussing registration abuse versus domain name use abuse, the
RAPWG noted that registration abuses may occur at various points in a
domain name?s lifecycle. The RAPWG attempted to make distinctions of
abuse within the lifecycle such as pre-domain-creation,
domain-creation, and post-creation. However, this exercise was not
useful in determining policy scope, and as such, the RAPWG only made
the distinction between Registration and Use.
Change @ Page 4/5
Change @ Page 21
Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.infinityportals.com
866.921.8891
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|