<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] here's a new version of the spreadsheet - based on the call today
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] here's a new version of the spreadsheet - based on the call today
- From: "Rosaya, Lisa W." <Lisa.Rosaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:24:05 -0400
Hi Mikey,
Wasn't it agreed that item 1 would be ranked as 5?
Best regards,
Lisa
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 11:07 AM
To: gnso-rapimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-rapimpl-dt] here's a new version of the spreadsheet -
based on the call today
hi all,
interestingly, we wound up following the "calculated rank" throughout --
so here's a version of the spreadsheet where i've typed in a few more
rankings from Greg and James.
way to go folks. i think we're in the home stretch. next week we
slice, we dice and frame up our report and then i think we're done.
thanks.
mikey
Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the Internal Revenue
Service, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any
attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes
of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related
matter.
This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has
been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and
then immediately delete this message. Please visit
www.bakermckenzie.com/disclaimers for other important information concerning
this message.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|