ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-restruc-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Meeting invitation

  • To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Meeting invitation
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:53:29 -0400

Inviting Remundo is fine with me.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 5:53 PM
> To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Meeting invitation
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It turns out that the Board's Structural Improvement 
> Committee (SIC),  
> has chosen Raimundo as its liaison to the GNSO Improvement Team.     
> Now the meeting on tuesday is not properly speaking a GNSO 
> Improvement Team Meeting, but as there are issues of 
> interpretation of board intentions, I was wondering whether 
> there would be any objection to my inviting Raimundo to the meeting.
> 
> Another process idea might be to just create a set of 
> questions that could be passed on to him and to others in the 
> SIC, but given that the interpretation issue has pushed back 
> completion of the exercise for a month or more, I was 
> thinking it might be an idea to try and eliminate the extra 
> step.  And if either people object to inviting him or he 
> cannot make it, that may be what we have to do in any case.
> 
> BTW: I may be being naively optimistic, but I would like to 
> be able to bring the proposed amendments to the By-laws to a 
> council vote in Sydney.
> 
> Thanks
> a.
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy