<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Meeting invitation
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Meeting invitation
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:53:29 -0400
Inviting Remundo is fine with me.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 5:53 PM
> To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Meeting invitation
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It turns out that the Board's Structural Improvement
> Committee (SIC),
> has chosen Raimundo as its liaison to the GNSO Improvement Team.
> Now the meeting on tuesday is not properly speaking a GNSO
> Improvement Team Meeting, but as there are issues of
> interpretation of board intentions, I was wondering whether
> there would be any objection to my inviting Raimundo to the meeting.
>
> Another process idea might be to just create a set of
> questions that could be passed on to him and to others in the
> SIC, but given that the interpretation issue has pushed back
> completion of the exercise for a month or more, I was
> thinking it might be an idea to try and eliminate the extra
> step. And if either people object to inviting him or he
> cannot make it, that may be what we have to do in any case.
>
> BTW: I may be being naively optimistic, but I would like to
> be able to bring the proposed amendments to the By-laws to a
> council vote in Sydney.
>
> Thanks
> a.
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|