<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5. In Section 3.1: Geographic distribution SG council members
- To: "Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5. In Section 3.1: Geographic distribution SG council members
- From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:17:46 -0700
Dear All,
To assist your discussions on these questions, I thought it would be useful to
provide the current proposed language on the table related to these questions.
Best Regards,
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Currently Proposed Revisions:
Each Stakeholder Group may select representatives according to its Charter
procedures. No individual representative may hold more than one seat on the
GNSO Council at the same time. For Stakeholder Groups with three seats on the
GNSO Council, no two representatives shall be citizens of the same country or
of countries located in the same Geographic Region except in cases where a
Stakeholder Group can demonstrate that there are no eligible and available
member representatives from three different regions. For Stakeholder Groups
with six seats on the GNSO Council, no four representatives shall be citizens
of the same country or of countries in the same Geographic Region except in
cases where a Stakeholder Group can demonstrate that there are no eligible and
available member representatives from four different regions.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 9:34 PM
To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5. In Section 3.1: Geographic distribution SG
council members
Q5. In Section 3.1: Geographic distribution SG council members
a) A change was proposed that allowed:
- a Non Contracted Party SG to appoint up to 4 (increased from 3) out
of 6 council members from one geographic regions
Should the change be retained?
b) A general question was also asked about the clause allowing even
these limits to be waived:
- for the Non Contracted Parties in:
except in cases where a Stakeholder Group can demonstrate that there are
no eligible and available member representatives from four different
regions.
- for the Contracted Parties
except in cases where a Stakeholder Group can demonstrate that there are
no eligible and available member representatives from four different
regions.
Does this languages need to be changed?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|