RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] object to proposal to change name of Non-Contracting Parties House

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Same document as attached and found on the Adobe Connect.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:54 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: Avri Doria; Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] object to proposal to change 
> name of Non-Contracting Parties House
> 
> Is there an updated doc or are we still working from the May 
> 5 version?
> Or is it on the wiki (I don't have access right now)?
>  
> Tim 
>  
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] object to proposal to change 
> name of Non-Contracting Parties House
> From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, May 12, 2009 8:48 am
> To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> For the House that I am part of, I am fine with the name 
> Contracted Parties.
> 
> Chuck 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:41 AM
> > To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] object to proposal to change name of 
> > Non-Contracting Parties House
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > On 12 May 2009, at 01:38, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> > 
> > > To weigh in here, I have no problem with 
> "non-contracting". "User" 
> > > was the term we used for much of the last year, and can 
> easily live 
> > > with that. Adding "provider" will cause endless confusion (since 
> > > Registrars and Registries are the providers of domain 
> names) and I 
> > > would object to that strenuously.
> > 
> > I have no real preference in this either way nd am comfortable with 
> > the original names as documented, but I do want to caution that the 
> > suggested new names might cause confusion.
> > 
> > e.g in looking at a random dictionary i get
> > 
> > supplier ▸ noun: someone whose business is to supply a particular 
> > service or commodity
> > 
> > provider ▸ noun: someone whose business is to supply a particular 
> > service or commodity
> > 
> > Yes, in one case it is the first definition and in another 
> it is the 
> > second definition, but using synonyms might not be the best 
> idea in an 
> > attempt to clarify.
> > 
> > With a certain amount of trepidation I offer another 
> possibility (and 
> > will not raise a peep if it is totally rejected or ignored)
> > 
> > How about keeping Contracted Parties for the contracted 
> parties since 
> > they seem happy with it and using Registrants and Users (or perhaps 
> > Registrants, Users , and Services) for the other house.
> > 
> > a.
> > 
> > 
> > a.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> 
>

Attachment: GNSO Council Restructure-Bylaws Changes - CSG edits v2 - Gomes comments.doc
Description: GNSO Council Restructure-Bylaws Changes - CSG edits v2 - Gomes comments.doc