Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds - chairs and vice chairs

["Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If the houses don't agree on a Chair, we would prefer a default Chair to no 
Chair. It would be a mistake not to consider what happens if 60 percent vote of 
both houses is not achieved.  Philip's proposal is organizationally dangerous.  
Thanks.  Jon

----- Original Message -----
From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri May 15 03:23:39 2009
Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds - chairs and vice chairs



Lets keep this simple.

"GNSO Council Chair - elected by 60% of both houses".  
"Vice Chair elected by each House"

And no reference to what if we cant agree. We always have in the last 10 years.
Lets not second guess defaults and end up with a poor chair just because of a 
default.
--------------------------------------

PS would colleagues consider spending 2 seconds of their time before hitting 
"reply to all"
to delete duplicate names before sending e-mails? This is both recipient 
friendly and
environmentally friendly.