Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] SIC Feedback to Questions raised by the Drafting Team on Bylaws Changes

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Please disregard my previous comment, it seems I was reading from a previous
document as I see in the latest draft that the houses are now called
"Contracted Parties" and Non-Contracted Parties".

Stéphane


Le 08/06/09 15:24, « Stéphane Van Gelder » <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> a
écrit :

> Thanks Raimundo,
> 
> This really is helpful feedback. It helps put an end to several discussions
> we've been having.
> 
> I note that the names of Houses and SGs should not be changed. So we will have
> the Users & Providers House and the Contracted Parties & Suppliers House,
> under which we will have the Registries SG, Registrar SG, Commercial SG and
> Non-Commercial SG, with constituencies following.
> 
> However, if that is the case, I am puzzled by the SIC's advice that "the usage
> of names like Suppliers, Providers and Indiduals should be avoided" but that
> the names should not be changed, since both suppliers and providers are terms
> used in the names being proposed for the SGs.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> Le 08/06/09 02:59, « rbeca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx » <rbeca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> 
>> 
>> Dear All:
>> 
>> As promised, I'm ataching you a set of Feedbacks from the SIC to the 10
>> Questions raised by the Drafting Team to he Board. Let me recall that the
>> Board authorized the SIC to provide these Feedbacks. However, the SIC
>> opinion is only a recommedation to the Board, which it is not bind to follow.
>> 
>> For sure, I would have liked to provide these Feedbacks quite before.
>> However, it was not possible.
>> 
>> Of course, feel free to raise any question at this respect.
>> 
>> Regards, Raimundo
>> --
>> Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
>>