RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting.

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Should we seek clarification from the SIC?  In the meantime, I strongly
suggest that we go ahead and send the proposed Bylaws changes to the
constituencies as quickly as possible and that we flag this (with a note
or footnote) along with any other areas where additional work may be
needed such as the comments I just sent.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
        Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 8:27 AM
        To: avri@xxxxxxx; gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting.
        
        

        We won't know how other 3 will be chosen till Board approves SG
charter or makes some other decision.
        Sent via blackberry mobile. Please excuse tone and typoes.
        
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
<owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
        To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
        Cc: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
        Sent: Tue Jun 09 05:09:30 2009
        Subject: Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting.
        
        
        Hi,
        
        I don't know.  I read that to mean that the 3 from NCUC were to
be 
        assigned as three of the (six) NCSG.  but I am will certainly
fix the 
        wording.  Any suggestions?
        
        thanks
        
        a.
        
        On 9 Jun 2009, at 13:38, Tim Ruiz wrote:
        
        > Avri,
        >
        > These two items do not jive. Shouldn't the latter be changed
to
        > "...increased to be six..."?
        >
        > Article X Section 1:
        > d. six representatives selected from the Non-Commercial
Stakeholder
        > Group; and
        >
        > Article XX Section 5:
        > d. The three seats currently assigned to the Non-Commercial
Users
        > Constituency shall be reassigned as three seats of the
Non-Commercial
        > Stakeholder Group.
        >
        > Tim
        >
        > -------- Original Message --------
        > Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting.
        > From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
        > Date: Mon, June 08, 2009 5:34 pm
        > To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        >
        >
        >
        > Hi,
        >
        > I have edited the text. It can be found at:
        >
https://st.icann.org/gnso_transition/index.cgi?proposed_by_laws
        >
        > I think I caught it all but it needs to be checked.
        >
        > In terms of motions and voting, I propose the following:
        >
        > - the motion included below be put in the schedule of 24 June.
I will
        > put myself down as the person making the motion. It will of
course
        > need a second.
        >
        > - any wording changes that we can reach consensus on on this
list, can
        > be treated as friendly amendments and just put in before the
vote.
        > Since I will be making the motion of behalf of this team, it
is the
        > consensus of this team that will indicate whether it is a
friendly
        > amendment or not.
        >
        > - any changes we cannot reach consensus on, can be voted on as
        > amendments before voting on the main motion. Of course someone
will
        > have to make and second these motions.
        >
        > By doing this, we can both present the rough consensus
position to the
        > Board as well as the results of any minority positions.
        >
        > The motion:
        >
        > Whereas
        >
        > Insert long history here that includes, review, BCG, Board
approval of
        > BCG, work of the team of the whole and SIC response:
(hopefully staff
        > can help in writing this chronology)
        >
        > Resolved
        >
        > The GNSO recommends that the By-laws related to the GNSO
council be
        > amended to read as follows:
        >
        > insert the text either by inclusion or reference:
        >
https://st.icann.org/gnso_transition/index.cgi?proposed_by_laws
        >
        >
        > thanks
        >
        > a.
        >
        >