ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting.

  • To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes,Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Followup from the meeting.
  • From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:19:38 -0400

I will need an important clarification on this. Forgive me but I was not on the 

The text you proposed _seems to_ only say that the 3 seats CURRENTLY assigned 
to NCUC will fold into NCSG. That's fine. 

I hope that it doesn't mean, that the seats are tied to NCUC and NCUC will 
still exist, and that there will be some constituency-based allocation of 
Council seats.

Once the NCSG is created, there isn't supposed to be an NCUC anymore. A generic 
constituency for "noncommercial users" simply doesn't make sense as one 
constituency in a "Noncommercial Stakeholders Group." The idea of our charter 
is that NCSG would elect its Council seats on an integrated basis, not on the 
basis of constituencies. 

So anything that permanently ties Council seats to specific constituencies is 
not acceptable.

Does everyone understand it this way? 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy