Re: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee Meeting

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Seems of to me.

Minor comments.

> Should each stakeholder group have at least one?

which begs the question I did not ask.  Is there a max.  3?

> on whether or not a
> self-review is needed, and if so, propose a framework for doing so.

We probably should refer to it as supplemental self-review to avoid the
confusion I had.

thanks

avri



On 06-May-14 09:44, Jen Wolfe wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you so much for your time on the call today.  In follow up to our
> discussion, I have briefly outlined the update we discussed providing to
> Council on Thursday, questions to pose to Council and our agreed upon
> time frame and next steps (attached).
> 
>  
> 
> In the interest of time, if you could please let me know any changes or
> revisions to this summary prior to the meeting on Thursday, I would
> really appreciate it. 
> 
>  
> 
> Marika, if you don’t mind sending out the request for a Doodle Poll, we
> can get our weekly meetings scheduled.  I also have a bit of an overlap
> with another board meeting on Thursday so I may not be able to be on the
> entire call, but will plan to jump on to lead this discussion on the
> Review.  I will have open Adobe Connect, but Marika, if you could email
> me when we are about 10 minutes out from the Review discussion, I would
> be most grateful.  The internet does allow us to be in two places at
> once – doesn’t it? J
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks again everyone for your time and I look forward to working with you!
> 
>  
> 
> With kindest regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Jen
> 
>  
> 
> *jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB*
> 
> Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
> 
> Co-Managing Partner, Wolfe Sadler Breen Morasch & Colby, intellectual
> property law, INTL Trademark Law Firm of the Year 2013
> 
>  
> 
> */513.746.2801/*
> 
> */IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011, 2012 & 2013/*
> 
> *Follow Me:** **Description: Description: Description: Description:
> cid:image001.png@01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0*
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jenwolfe>* **Description: Description:
> Description: Description: cid:image002.png@01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0*
> <http://pinterest.com/wolfedomain/>* **Description: Description:
> Description: Description: cid:image003.png@01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0*
> <https://twitter.com/jenwolfe>
> 
> *Follow My Blog <http://www.jenwolfe.com/blog>*
> 
> *_Domain Names Rewired
> <http://www.amazon.com/Domain-Names-Rewired-Strategies-Protection/dp/1118312627>_*
> 
>  
> 
> *From:* owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Marika Konings
> *Sent:* Monday, May 05, 2014 10:17 AM
> *To:* gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-review-dt] Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee Meeting
> 
>  
> 
> Dear All,
> 
>  
> 
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the GNSO Review Committee
> meeting tomorrow as well as some related documents attached for your review.
> 
>  
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Marika
> 
>  
> 
> *Proposed Agenda – GNSO Review Committee Meeting – 6 May 2014*
> 
>  
> 
> ·         Scope of Work for the committee
> 
> ·         Developing a self-review to run in tandem with the SIC Review
> 
> ·         Size & composition of the committee
> 
> o   Transparency
> 
> o   Brand Registry Group interest in the Review
> 
> o   Other group interests in the review
> 
> ·         Frequency of Meetings
> 
> ·         Webinar Preparation
> 
> ·         Next Steps
> 
>  
> 
>  
>