Re: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee Meeting

[Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi everybody, just a small suggestion ­ if the term ³self review² causes
confusion, how about the phrase ³self study²? That¹s what graduate schools
use to prepare themselves for the periodic review by their accreditation
bodies (e.g. The American Bar Association for its accredited law schools).

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx

* One World. One Internet. *

From:  Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Tuesday, May 6, 2014 at 12:27 PM
To:  "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx>, Marika Konings
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx"
<gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc:  "Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx)"
<jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  [gnso-review-dt] RE: Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee
Meeting

> Thanks Larisa and Avri for comments.  I incorporated your comments and attach
> a revised version for reference.  Of course, please let me know if you propose
> other revisions or additions.  I look forward to the webinar tomorrow and
> discussion with the Council on Thursday.   Thanks ­ have a great afternoon!
>  
> 
> jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB
> Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
> Co-Managing Partner, Wolfe Sadler Breen Morasch & Colby, intellectual property
> law, INTL Trademark Law Firm of the Year 2013
>  
> 513.746.2801
> IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011, 2012 & 2013
> Follow Me:  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jenwolfe>
> <http://pinterest.com/wolfedomain/>   <https://twitter.com/jenwolfe>
> Follow My Blog <http://www.jenwolfe.com/blog>
> Domain Names Rewired
> <http://www.amazon.com/Domain-Names-Rewired-Strategies-Protection/dp/111831262
> 7> 
>  
> 
> From: Larisa B. Gurnick [mailto:larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 12:06 PM
> To: Jen Wolfe; Marika Konings; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> Subject: RE: Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee Meeting
>  
> Jen,
> Thank you for the productive meeting and the outline.  I propose several edits
> in the spirit of clarity and consistency of terminology.
>  
> The SIC is planning a 360 review to be facilitated by an independent auditor.
> This will seek input from the community on a variety of topics.
>  
> ·        I would use ³360 Assessment² rather than ³360 Review² and ³examiner²
> rather than ³auditor².
> 
> ·        The independent examiner will not be facilitating the 360 Assessment
> - they will use the data collected via the 360 as one of the key data points
> for the review.
> 
> ·        As one of the components of the overall GNSO Review, the 360
> Assessment is envisioned as an online tool that will collect feedback from the
> GNSO community, other ICANN structures and community members, the Board and
> staff.  The 360 Assessment questions will be developed based on criteria that
> will be used for the overall GNSO Review.  The proposed scope for the GNSO
> Review Working Party includes it providing  feedback on review criteria and
> the 360 Assessment.
> 
>  
> Thank you,
>  
> Larisa
>  
> Larisa B. Gurnick
> Director, Strategic Initiatives
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx
> 310 383-8995
>  
>  
> 
> From:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Jen Wolfe
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 6:44 AM
> To: Marika Konings; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee Meeting
>  
> Hi everyone,
>  
> Thank you so much for your time on the call today.  In follow up to our
> discussion, I have briefly outlined the update we discussed providing to
> Council on Thursday, questions to pose to Council and our agreed upon time
> frame and next steps (attached).
>  
> In the interest of time, if you could please let me know any changes or
> revisions to this summary prior to the meeting on Thursday, I would really
> appreciate it. 
>  
> Marika, if you don¹t mind sending out the request for a Doodle Poll, we can
> get our weekly meetings scheduled.  I also have a bit of an overlap with
> another board meeting on Thursday so I may not be able to be on the entire
> call, but will plan to jump on to lead this discussion on the Review.  I will
> have open Adobe Connect, but Marika, if you could email me when we are about
> 10 minutes out from the Review discussion, I would be most grateful.  The
> internet does allow us to be in two places at once ­ doesn¹t it? J
>  
> Thanks again everyone for your time and I look forward to working with you!
>  
> With kindest regards,
>  
> Jen
>  
> 
> jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB
> Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
> Co-Managing Partner, Wolfe Sadler Breen Morasch & Colby, intellectual property
> law, INTL Trademark Law Firm of the Year 2013
>  
> 513.746.2801
> IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011, 2012 & 2013
> Follow Me:  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jenwolfe>
> <http://pinterest.com/wolfedomain/>   <https://twitter.com/jenwolfe>
> Follow My Blog <http://www.jenwolfe.com/blog>
> Domain Names Rewired
> <http://www.amazon.com/Domain-Names-Rewired-Strategies-Protection/dp/111831262
> 7> 
>  
> 
> From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Marika Konings
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 10:17 AM
> To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee Meeting
>  
> 
> Dear All,
> 
>  
> 
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the GNSO Review Committee meeting
> tomorrow as well as some related documents attached for your review.
> 
>  
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Marika
> 
>  
> 
> Proposed Agenda ­ GNSO Review Committee Meeting ­ 6 May 2014
> 
>  
> 
> ·         Scope of Work for the committee
> 
> ·         Developing a self-review to run in tandem with the SIC Review
> 
> ·         Size & composition of the committee
> 
> o   Transparency
> 
> o   Brand Registry Group interest in the Review
> 
> o   Other group interests in the review
> 
> ·         Frequency of Meetings
> 
> ·         Webinar Preparation
> 
> ·         Next Steps
> 
>  
>

Attachment: image001.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: image002.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: image003.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature