ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-review-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised

  • To: "'Gomes, Chuck'" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Larisa B. Gurnick'" <larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised
  • From: "Ron Andruff" <ra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:14:55 -0400

Dear Chuck and all,

 

Yes, but. .you make a good point that we are not delving into Working Groups
at all when, in point of fact, the changes made during the last GNSO review
moved us to the Working Group model.  For my part, I think it would be
prudent to have at least one question on the effectiveness of WGs and
perhaps another to flesh out the community's overall view of them.  Let's do
our best to address this key aspect.  Thanks for bringing it forward Chuck.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ron Andruff

dotSport LLC

 <http://www.lifedotsport.com> www.lifedotsport.com 

 

From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 19:05
To: Larisa B. Gurnick; gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Richard G A Westlake
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised

 

I just completed the survey in a little over 30 minutes.  I answered
questions for the GNSO Council and the RySG but I did not respond the last
three open ended questions.

 

I think the assessment is looking very good.  Because working groups are
such an important part of the GNSO, I think it is unfortunate that there are
no questions about them.  At the same time I also am not in favor of trying
to accomplish too much in one survey so I am not advocating that we add more
questions at this time.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Larisa B. Gurnick
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 6:50 PM
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
Cc: Richard G A Westlake
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised

 

Dear All,

The Westlake Governance team modified the 360 Assessment based on feedback
received last week.  The revised 360 Assessment is available here
<https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GNSO360ReviewUATv3> .  Please provide your
final feedback and any additional comments from your constituencies  by
August 1, 23:59 UTC.

 

The responder now has the option of skipping the detailed questions
pertaining to the GNSO Council, Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies.  A
responder who is directly involved or is a close observer in any of these
groups, will be able to answer detailed questions for as many groups as
he/she would like.

 

The introductory language will be further refined to provide a clear roadmap
of the different sections of the Assessment and the options available to the
responder.

 

Please note that staff is in the process of completing a detailed proofing
and editing to ensure proper spelling, capitalization, definition of
acronyms, etc.

 

Thank you for your feedback and commitment to making this assessment useful
and informative.

 

Larisa B. Gurnick

Director, Strategic Initiatives

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx> 

310 383-8995

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy