<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-review-dt] your report
- To: Colin Jackson <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] your report
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:18:19 +0800
Hi,
I wish to withdraw part of my statement. I assumed I knew the short
list who uttered those statements. I can't know and there is every
chance that I am wrong. I am glad I did not name names, but I must say,
the problem remains with the quotes and the fact that many have already
had the same assumption about the speakers I had.
Apologies for the intemperance on that one point.
I do request that the incendiary quotes be removed from the report.
avri
On 12-Feb-15 07:35, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Personally I find it unfortuante that your draft report put out
> calumnious quotes that have no basic in fact. I for one have been
> working very hard to help NPOC make its way in the NCSG and find the
> fact that this is what you picked to include so very unfortunate. Now
> instead of dealing with the substance of the report the NCUC is going
> to have to deal with arguing against the lies.
>
> It also seems that you went against your rule of not including quotes
> where the speaker could be identified. While it may be hard to pin
> the specific speaker, the choice of one of two possible speakers is
> relatively easy. What you have done is take a sometimes difficult
> situation that has been improving over the years, entered it as
> patisans and made it so much worse. Now a competition of who can mud
> sling best is going to be much harder to contain.
>
> It is sad that you have made the work of consensus building so much
> harder.
>
> avri
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|