ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-review-dt] your report

  • To: Colin Jackson <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] your report
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:18:19 +0800


I wish to withdraw part of my statement.  I assumed I knew the short
list who uttered those statements.  I can't know and there is every
chance that I am wrong.  I am glad I did not name names, but I must say,
the problem remains with the quotes and the fact that many have already
had the same assumption  about the speakers I had.

Apologies for the intemperance on that one point.

I do request that the incendiary quotes be removed from the report.


On 12-Feb-15 07:35, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
> Personally I find it unfortuante that your draft report put out
> calumnious quotes that have no basic in fact.  I for one have been
> working very hard to help NPOC make its way in the NCSG and find the
> fact that this is what you picked to include so very unfortunate.  Now
> instead of dealing with the substance of the report the NCUC is going
> to have to deal with arguing against the lies.
> It also seems that you went against your rule of not including quotes
> where the speaker could be identified.  While it may be hard to pin
> the specific speaker, the choice of one of two possible speakers is
> relatively easy.  What you have done is take a sometimes difficult
> situation that has been improving over the years, entered it as
> patisans and made it so much worse.  Now a competition of who can mud
> sling best is going to be much harder to contain.
> It is sad that you have made the work of consensus building so much
> harder.
> avri

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy