ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-review-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires

  • To: Charla Shambley <charla.shambley@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 20:19:53 +0000

Charla,

 

Before I enter comments in the Initial Assessment, I want to make sure I
understand what is being requested.

.         Should we enter our opinion as to whether the recommendation
should be 'accepted as is', 'accepted with modification', or 'rejected'
along with our rationale?

.         Does it make sense to do this before the public comment ends and
we have the comment summary?

.         Am I correct that it would be helpful if we rate the feasibility
and usefulness of the recommendation?  If so, how should we rate these two
factors?  A common scale for all of us would be helpful.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Charla Shambley
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 1:12 PM
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Colin Jackson
(colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx); Vaughan Renner
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session
in Buenos Aires

 

Dear GNSO Review Working Party:

 

I hope this email finds you well after ICANN53!  Following up to Larisa's
email which summarized your work in Buenos Aires and next steps, I wanted to
point out a few items:

 

.        Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments from the
Working Party and Staff on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36
recommendations.  See Initial Assessment of Recommendations
<https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Initial+Assessment+of+Recommendatio
ns> .  We have organized the recommendations by theme to coincide with the
structure of the Draft Report.  Each recommendation has its own page (see
Recommendation 1 <https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Recommendation+1>
for example).  Please add your comments in the "Working Party" section (you
must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or
initials to your comments.

 

.        A doodle poll has been set up to schedule a Working Party call on
28, 29 or 30 July to consider community comments and prioritize draft
recommendations.  Please click on the link to provide your availability:
Doodle Poll <http://doodle.com/c686t94p7ph4rnec> .  I will close the poll by
8 July and send out an invitation for your calendar.

 

.        Relevant discussion for implementation planning - please see the
summary of comments and responses
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-proposed-aoc-org-reviews-process-15ma
y15/msg00002.html>  from the 24 June public session "AoC and Organizational
Reviews: Supporting ICANN Accountability
<https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-aoc-org-reviews> ".

 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

 

Charla

 

 

Charla K. Shambley

Strategic Initiatives Program Manager

ICANN

12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300

Los Angeles, CA  90094

310-578-8921

 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy