Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations

[William Drake <wjdrake@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi

I agree with Stephanie.  A lot of volunteers are really maxed out right now 
with time sensitive stuff so it is very difficult to get people focused on 
this, and without community engagement the level of buy in going forward would 
seem questionable.

Bill

> On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:11 PM, Stephanie Perrin 
> <stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Maybe with all that is going on it would be a good idea to extend the 
> deadline for another couple of weeks.   Seems like a profound waste of time 
> if noone comments....
> cheers Stephanie
> PS folks are busy....
> 
> On 2015-07-22 14:06, Charla Shambley wrote:
>> Dear GNSO Review WP, 
>>  
>> To date, only one comment has been received via the comments forum 
>> <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/> on the open 
>> Public Comment 
>> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-review-draft-2015-06-01-en> of 
>> the Draft Report on the GNSO Review 
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Draft+Report+of+the+Independent+Examiner>.
>>   In order to allow the community additional time to provide feedback on the 
>> Draft Report 
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Draft+Report+of+the+Independent+Examiner>,
>>  an announcement <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-07-15-en> was 
>> posted last week that extends the Public Comment 
>> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-review-draft-2015-06-01-en> 
>> period through 23:59 UTC on 24 July.  I urge you to encourage your groups to 
>> submit comments by Friday.  Comments provided verbally during ICANN53 are 
>> being catalogued and will be posted and considered as part of public 
>> comment. 
>>  
>> I wanted to remind the Working Party that Staff has set up several wiki 
>> pages to capture comments on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 
>> recommendations proposed by Westlake in their Draft Report 
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Draft+Report+of+the+Independent+Examiner>
>>  (also see Initial Assessment of Recommendations 
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Initial+Assessment+of+Recommendations>).
>>   The recommendations are organized by theme on the wiki to coincide with 
>> the structure of the Draft Report.  Each recommendation has its own page 
>> (see Recommendation 1 
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Recommendation+1> for example).  
>> Please add your comments in the “Working Party” section (you must be logged 
>> in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your 
>> comments.  Staff acknowledges your busy schedule and extensive participation 
>> to date, however please note that it would be helpful to capture your 
>> comments on the recommendations before our call scheduled on 30 July @ 19:00 
>> UTC (agenda to follow).  If you would rather send an email with your 
>> comments to me, please specify which recommendation you are commenting on 
>> and I will post them to the wiki on your behalf.  Chuck, thank you for 
>> taking the time to provide your comments on the wiki.
>>  
>> <Mail Attachment.png> 
>> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-review-draft-2015-06-01-en>
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>  
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Charla
>>  
>> Charla K. Shambley
>> Strategic Initiatives Program Manager
>> ICANN
>> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>> Los Angeles, CA  90094
>> 310-578-8921
> 
> 

*********************************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
  ICANN, www.ncuc.org
william.drake@xxxxxx (direct), wjdrake@xxxxxxxxx (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org
Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q
*********************************************************