<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting
- To: Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting
- From: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:25:21 +0800
Thanks Jen,
I apologize not being able to attend the 30 July call. I'll refer to Osvaldo
whether he could make it as alternative.
Wolf-Ulrich
Sent from my personal phone
> Am 24.07.2015 um 20:38 schrieb Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hello GNSO Review Working Team:
>
> Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As
> you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns
> expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I
> am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending
> the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or
> individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate
> those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone
> to have your respective groups provide comments by next week’s deadline,
> which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be
> issued on 31 August.
>
> I have summarized the comments received to date below:
>
> Comments to date:
> · Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment on 16 July
> · Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment on 23 July
> · In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC – all expected to
> be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but
> staff is not currently aware of this.
> · 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions – see
> posted table
>
> Public Comment/Engagement:
> This Public Comment period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24
> July – total of 53 days.
> · During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the
> community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session on
> Reviews.
> · A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been
> catalogued and are being considered by Westlake – see the posted table.
>
> As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to
> discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on
> which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like
> to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to
> touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but
> certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all
> public comments have been received.
>
> I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll
> to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled.
>
> Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great
> weekend!
>
> Jen
>
>
> JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB
> FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM
> 513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348
> IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 2011-2014
> What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P
> Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc
> Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP
> Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|