[gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Doodle Poll for Next Meeting - INPUT NEEDED BY 7 AUG
Dear WP I will keep the doodle poll <http://doodle.com/f636d5k7uvg7r4z4> open through Friday, 7 August, since I noticed many of you have not had an opportunity to provide your availability. I have been informed that some of the proposed dates conflict with the GDD Industry Summit. I can certainly coordinate a private room at the venue if we determine that a time during the Summit is convenient to a majority of WP members. The GNSO Secretariat will send out a calendar invite once we determine the most convenient time for a call. Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions. Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 From: Charla Shambley Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 10:08 AM To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx Subject: GNSO Review - Doodle Poll for Next Meeting Dear GNSO Review WP -- By now you should have received a cancellation for the call tomorrow from the GNSO Secretariat. Per Jen's email below, I have set up a doodle poll <http://doodle.com/f636d5k7uvg7r4z4> so that we can schedule our next call in September to begin the discussion on implementation. I will close the doodle poll by COB Tuesday, 4 August. Also, just a reminder that we do have the wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Initial+Assessment+of+Recommendatio ns> set up to capture your comments and initial assessment of the recommendations in the Draft Report <https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Draft+Report+of+the+Independent+Exa miner> . Your input into the feasibility and usefulness of each of the recommendations will be helpful during our next call. For those of you on holiday in August, enjoy! Regards, Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:00 AM To: Novoa, Osvaldo; Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx; Larisa B. Gurnick Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting Thank you to everyone who has responded. Based upon the responses, I think we only have 3 people (including me) who can attend the call this Thursday, 30 July. If anyone else can attend, please let me know, but I'm concerned that without more attending the call, we will have to repeat much of the conversation when others can join and want to ensure we have sufficient feedback to move this initiative forward before the October Dublin meeting. Chuck and Osvlado, I so appreciate your availability, but also deeply respect your time and don't want you to feel like it is not productive because there are not enough groups represented on the call. I'd like to suggest we move this call to September when everyone will be back from August holiday and public comments will be completed and we could start to work on feedback towards implementation with more participation. I'm completely happy to still get on a call on Thursday if you all think that is going to be worthwhile, but also happy to send out a new Doodle poll to try to get more participation. Please let me know your comments and thoughts and we can plan accordingly. Thanks so much. For all of you heading on holiday - have a great one! Jen JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM 513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : <http://ow.ly/Ebl8P> http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs <http://ow.ly/Eblgc> http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column <http://ow.ly/EbljP> http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands <http://ow.ly/EbloM> http://ow.ly/EbloM -----Original Message----- From: Novoa, Osvaldo [ <mailto:onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx> mailto:onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 11:35 PM To: <mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Jen Wolfe < <mailto:jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx> gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting I am available for the 30th of July. Best regards, Osvaldo Enviado desde mi iPhone El 24/7/2015, a las 22:26, " <mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx%3cmailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online. de%3e> Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>" < <mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx%3cmailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online. de> Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>> escribió: Thanks Jen, I apologize not being able to attend the 30 July call. I'll refer to Osvaldo whether he could make it as alternative. Wolf-Ulrich Sent from my personal phone Am 24.07.2015 um 20:38 schrieb Jen Wolfe < <mailto:jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%3cmailto:jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>: Hello GNSO Review Working Team: Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week's deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August. I have summarized the comments received to date below: Comments to date: · Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment< <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00000.html> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00000.html> on 16 July · Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment< <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00001.html> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00001.html> on 23 July · In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC - all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. · 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions - see posted< <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00002.html> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00002.html> table Public Comment/Engagement: This Public Comment< <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-review-draft-2015-06-01-en> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-review-draft-2015-06-01-en> period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July - total of 53 days. · During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session< <https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-aoc-org-reviews> https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-aoc-org-reviews> on Reviews. · A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake - see the posted< <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00002.html> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00002.html> table. As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great weekend! Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : <http://ow.ly/Ebl8P> http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs <http://ow.ly/Eblgc> http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column <http://ow.ly/EbljP> http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands <http://ow.ly/EbloM> http://ow.ly/EbloM ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. Attachment:
smime.p7s |