RE: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks very much Bill.  I understanding the challenge of coordinating replies 
and, in fact, am very pleased that you were very able to do it so quickly.  I 
don’t understand why we wouldn’t thank Westlake and staff for their efforts.  
That seems to me to be just simple courtesy.  In a quick read of your other 
suggested edits, I didn’t see any that seem unworkable from my point of view.

Chuck



From: William Drake [mailto:wjdrake@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 8:13 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft Statement on 
Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

Hi

Thanks Chuck for your work here, appreciated.  Sorry for the slow reply but 
coordination takes time and nobody had factored another round of corrections 
and rebuttals into their schedules.

You nicely make a number of the points NCUC would raise.  At the same time, 
there are a couple passages that just don’t work for us, and a couple 
amplifications we’d add.  I attach suggested edits to discuss on the call 
later.  If we can get consensus on RT comments fine, if not ok we can each 
submit separate replies as befits a process engineered to strengthen divisions 
rather than promote consensus in the community.

Best

Bill

On Sep 18, 2015, at 1:18 AM, Gomes, Chuck 
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

I took a first crack at possible Working Party comments on Westlake's 
Recommendation 23 that we discussed in most of our meeting yesterday.  I have 
to confess that I am not real satisfied with my draft but I hope that it will 
facilitate our efforts to create one even if we ignore mine and start from 
scratch.

If we do develop comments, I think that it would be important for us to try to 
get unanimous approval by Working Team members who participate in writing and 
approving the comments or, if we cannot do that, at least provide an 
opportunity for minority statements.

Open and free criticism is welcome including from those in the NPOC like Klaus.

Chuck
<Draft Points on Westlake Goverance GNSO Review Final Report.docx>