ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-review-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-review-dt] MP3 recording GNSO Review Working Party teleconference 21 September 2015 16:00UTC

  • To: "gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-review-dt] MP3 recording GNSO Review Working Party teleconference 21 September 2015 16:00UTC
  • From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:27:54 +0000


Dear All,

Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Review Working Party teleconference 
held on Wednesday, 16 September 2015 at 16:00 UTC:  
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-21sep15-en.mp3<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=NrFWbrBstcrPWP369qgbqlXiSKeL20xnUXzI03Zqpsv1THdVec-2Fmo1HcL7-2BSzyP7z03BsHkAR8zI5x4rHgz-2Biw-3D-3D_QuA5zZR9ZZ7J1F2FeF-2FOsgm1hgIDcBrAX2P7Ezxmql7ckJc4ios1-2BxObAoz2rzLSI3c4QB1NGo7bw7XrBjpRCbz74w4vzk48UxZMFoBBQBQaQ0ePdiOjdJ30sQNHkokOf-2F2p-2FBvMgKvMhzp-2B4u8fP-2BRrSytHe2KCf2HpQmtSbpezMgNTUG57PiORAPesOotpHA-2BC4pSmXJRsVmpbNaLqznIhFya7dPEVApIXxg8VrfrWAl3JD-2F7n5AYNjjPuxCr1i06zdAwlekj8323mboAwlBN2Jp72Slbhciyo59nfyZJhOm6PcnpC6xg8MJLj-2B64maJybffmtMgBJ6X5zg9l6-2FsNCWoBs40nLHmcDX7pvgdxbl6G7D6IWykcu7Sth2VRdwtGga6W9hTQqekdVblXG5zfoFfCmHxR745-2B-2FQAMkxitpE0OkK9LnMBC-2FZWkJCGkJmwenwNQdI6r121-2Bw08ztY-2Fj7WypekPf60nNzYzFnKwFPgCgXa03WiKdkkKewhgvu>

 On page:

<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#mar>http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#s<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#sep >ep<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#sep >
 <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#sep >



 The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master 
Calendar page:

http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/



Attendees:

Jennifer Wolfe

Klaus Stoll

Chuck Gomes

Bill Drake

Rafik Dammak

Jeff Neuman
Joan Kerr
Martin Silva
David Cake

Observer: Amr Elsadr


Apologies:

none





ICANN Staff:

Mary Wong

Marika Konings

Lars Hoffman

Larisa Gurnick

Charla Shambley

Terri Agnew

Nathalie Peregrine



** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Nathalie



Adobe Chat transcript:

Nathalie  Peregrine:Dear all, Welcome to the GNSO Review Working Party on the 
21 September 2015
  Mary Wong:It's already Tuesday in Asia Pacific! :)
  Amr Elsadr:Hi all. I hope it's OK that I'm crashing this call again. :)
  Nathalie  Peregrine:Scrolling is enabled for all
  Chuck Gomes:Crashers welcome!
  Bill Drake:fair point Jen
  Marika Konings:Is the Working Party also planning to inform / seek 
endorsement from the GNSO Council on the letter?
  Amr Elsadr:Gratitude Chuck. :) And thanks for drafting a WP comment to the 
OEC.
  Chuck Gomes:I think any statement should be supported by the Working Party 
but participation in our discussion is fine with me.
  Rudi Vansnick:NPOC is still  working on the document as it got changes this 
morning too
  Bill Drake:There's been a fairly high level of disengagment from the start, 
which I think is telling. I'd hope we could get all groups on board but...
  Bill Drake:I agree there will be more points along the timeline for Council, 
next week is not realistic
  Amr Elsadr:@Chuck: I agree. Time is tight for council consideration. If 
endorsement can be achieved and will be helpful post Sep 28th, we could aim for 
that.
  Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: Do you have an estimate on when NPOC may be ready to 
comment on this?
  Marika Konings:It may be worth to reconfirm membership?
  Marika Konings:as some people may have moved on to other things in the 
meantime?
  Rudi Vansnick:we had a meeting last week and scheduled another one this week
  Chuck Gomes:Reconfirming membership is a good idea.
  Rudi Vansnick:we need to review the text as it is now presented (today)
  Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: Is this week's meeting before or after tomorrow's NCSG 
monthly call?
  Rudi Vansnick:@Amr: no it is not, but I will try with Klaus to work on a text
  Chuck Gomes:If and when we sent out a draft statement to see if there are any 
objections or edits we could also ask members to let us know if they are not 
any longer participating.
  Amr Elsadr:Thanks Rudi.
  Amr Elsadr:I can zoom in and out of the document on the screen, but can't 
seem to scroll down. Help?
  Bill Drake:Amr it was also on the email list if you want a copy
  Amr Elsadr:Thank Jen and Bill.
  Bill Drake:General comment again -- thanks Chuck for the work
  Amr Elsadr:As far as the NCSG is concerned, I believe this has been 
extensively discussed in the past, so it shouldn't be too difficult bringing 
our members up to speed on what's happening with rec #23.
  Bill Drake:to be clear I'm not objecting to the structure, I'm just asking if 
people find it sserviceable
  Amr Elsadr:Can't speak for other groups.
  Bill Drake:I'm partial to the UN numbered paragraph approach
  Amr Elsadr:I like "tribal silos" and moats. Very medieval!! :)
  Bill Drake:I LOVE interest groups
  Bill Drake:I think beyond a certain level there are differences IG vs C 
operationally
  Bill Drake:but we have what we have
  Bill Drake:nope
  Bill Drake:I was wondering about that too Amr
  Bill Drake:is that text a little hard to follow?
  Rudi Vansnick:for clarification : NPOC's silence during this call is due to 
the fact we are still deliberating on the text
  Rudi Vansnick:it would be good if we could have the last version in word, as 
we only got in pdf format
  Bill Drake:I actually thought you were going to speak about c i&ii
  Amr Elsadr:@Chuck: Thanks, and fully agree. I'll go over this more carefully, 
and try to see if some of this can be tweaked, or not.
  Bill Drake:could replace the change procedures clause
  Bill Drake:could be remedied by ensuring that all its Constituencies are 
represented
  Bill Drake:of course
  Jeff Neuman:I will make sure the registrars are up to date
  Amr Elsadr:Rudi has indicated that NPOC are still undecided.
  Bill Drake:we certainly should all be able to express concern that a Rec. 
with such broad implications was inserted at the end without our vetting it
  Bill Drake:Amr the Word doc was sent on the list
  Bill Drake:tracked by Google or tracked by Microsoft
  Mary Wong:Council meeting is at 1800 UTC on Thursday.
  Amr Elsadr:I'm actually still subscribed to the WP list, so with everyone's 
permission, I will circulate another draft to the list.
  Amr Elsadr:Mary answered the question before it was asked. :)
  Amr Elsadr:Agree with Chuck.
  Amr Elsadr:@Jen: Will you be briefing the council on Thursday?
  Charla Shambley:link to the doodle poll: 
http://doodle.com/poll/i566km5tqqhavk3v#table
  Mary Wong:@Amr, I believe Jen has been invited and there is an agenda item 
for this, yes.
  Bill Drake:thanks Jen
  Marika Konings:@Mary, Amr - yes that is correct
  Rudi Vansnick:thanks Jen  and Chuck
  Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy